Clsi Ep28 Apr 2026

Then came the case that changed everything.

The lower limit of her in-house reference interval was 0.6 mIU/L. The upper limit was 3.2.

Three weeks later, Mrs. Park was in the ER with atrial fibrillation—a known risk of overtreatment in the elderly. clsi ep28

Dr. Aliyah Vargas had run the University Hospital’s clinical chemistry lab for twelve years, and in that time, she had learned to trust two things: cold logic and the CLSI guidelines. EP28, specifically—the standard for defining, establishing, and verifying reference intervals—was her bible. It told her what “normal” looked like for a patient population.

The root cause analysis landed on Aliyah’s desk. She stared at the EP28 document, the same dog-eared copy she’d used for twenty years. And then she read the section she’d always skimmed: Then came the case that changed everything

The conflict tore the lab apart. Clinicians started calling. A healthy medical student with a TSH of 3.8—perfectly fine by the old book—was now flagged high. An exhausted intern with a TSH of 0.5 was flagged low, even though she felt fine after a night shift.

Aliyah nodded. “But EP28 says if we have 120 subjects, nonparametric ranking is the gold standard. The 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles are 0.6 and 3.2. That’s our truth.” Three weeks later, Mrs

Mrs. Park wasn’t abnormal. Aliyah’s reference population was just too young.

She pulled the raw data from her 120 healthy subjects. Most were young—residents, techs, nurses under 40. Only seven were over 65. The elderly subgroup, small as it was, had a higher median TSH.

“Reference intervals may need to be partitioned by age, sex, or other factors… especially for analytes like TSH, where values increase with age.”

Aliyah recruited 120 healthy volunteers from hospital staff: non-pregnant, no chronic meds, no thyroid history. She drew their blood in the gold-top tubes at 8:00 AM sharp, spun them down, and ran them in duplicate. The data came back clean—but wrong.