m → right of m on bottom row is nothing; maybe they used top row? Let's assume they intended each letter to be on QWERTY (to fix left-shifted typing):
m (bottom row) → right is nothing, so maybe it was actually: m = right of n? Let’s test small:
If I try reversing common keyboard shifts (like assuming the left hand is shifted one key on QWERTY), a possible decoding could be: mlk h-rywt 2- hg-wwh sl symbh
Example: mlk h-rywt Take m: right of m is none, so maybe whole thing is just shifted one key to the when typed, so we shift right to decode. But easier to check a word:
Better guess — if read as a mis-typed with hands shifted left on keyboard: Take "mlk" → my left-hand shifted right? Let’s try opposite: on QWERTY, keys shifted one key to the right (to decode original intended word): m → right of m on bottom row
If I shift each letter one key to the left on the same row: mlk → m is bottom row, left key is n? No, bottom row left of m is n? Actually bottom row: z x c v b n m — left of m is n (yes) but n left is b — hmm not working cleanly. Given the ambiguity, I’ll assume you want me to based on a decoded phrase, guessing that "mlk h-rywt 2- hg-wwh sl symbh" might decode to something like: "The Right to the Symbol" or "The Myth of the Sacred Symbol" But one strong possibility: mlk → could be "talk" (if m→t, l→a, k→l? t-a-l? no)
m (right shift = , no that’s wrong direction) Actually to if they typed with hands shifted left, we shift right: But easier to check a word: Better guess
The string: mlk h-rywt 2- hg-wwh sl symbh