Salo Or Salo Or The 120 Days Of Sodom Now

Pasolini transposes the Marquis de Sade’s infamous 18th-century novel (written in a prison cell) to the fascist puppet state of Salò, Italy, 1944. Four libertine masters—a Duke, a Bishop, a Magistrate, and a President—abduct eighteen young men and women. They take them to a isolated villa, where for 120 days, the teenagers are subjected to a systematic program of humiliation, ritualized depravity, and eventual torture and murder.

★★★★ (but I will never watch it again) salo or salo or the 120 days of sodom

There are difficult films, and then there is Pier Paolo Pasolini’s 1975 masterpiece of horror, Salò, or the 120 Days of Sodom . Over forty years later, it still sits on the farthest edge of what cinema can endure. ★★★★ (but I will never watch it again)

Modern horror like Saw or Hostel uses violence as a roller-coaster—you flinch, then it’s over. Salò is the opposite. Pasolini’s camera is static, patient, and horrifyingly polite. He shows you a banquet of excrement, a wedding ceremony that ends in mutilation, and forced copulation—not to excite, but to indict. Salò is the opposite

Have you seen Salò ? Do you think a film can go too far? Or is “too far” exactly the point? Let’s discuss—with care. Image description: A still from the film—the four libertines in black suits seated at a long table, staring at the camera. The room is gilded and elegant. Their faces are expressionless.

You do not “like” Salò . You survive it. And if you have the stomach to look, you will see a mirror held up not just to 1944, but to any society that treats humans as things—including our own.